Allowed

Kallu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 May 2015CR. MISC./48418/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Kallu Kumar, named in Paliganj P.S. Case No. 290 of 2013 for offences under Sections 384, 436 and 504/34 IPC. The court ordered his release on arrest or surrender within eight weeks upon furnishing a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail if arrested or surrenders within eight weeks by furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties.

Kallu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48418 of 2014

¶2

Arising out of PS.Case No. -290 Year- 2013 Thana -PALIGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== Kallu Kumar, S/o Arun Singh, resident of Village Mauri, P.S. Paliganj, District Patna at present residing at Mohalla Indra Nagar, P.S. Paliganj, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. D.P.Tiwary(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

3 20-05-2015

¶4

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 290 of 2013 for the offences instituted under Sections 384, 436 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The prosecution story, in brief, is that before the alleged occurrence, the petitioner Kallu Kumar had demanded ransom from the informant. Later on, co-accused Sonu Kumar alongwith one unknown person came to the wine shop of the informant and asked for wine which was not provided by the informant because the shop was closed on official closing day. Thereafter, in the night co-accused Sonu Kumar and others came and committed arson in the wine shop.

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48418 of 2014 (3) dt.20-05-2015

¶6

2 / 2

¶7

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Further it has been submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that no specific allegation has been alleged in the F.I.R. i.e., against the petitioner.

¶8

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but no specific allegation against the petitioner has been made regarding his participation in the said occurrence.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named, petitioner, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 290 of 2013 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

¶10

Procedure.

¶11

U.K./-

¶12

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶13

U T

Kallu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kallu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Convenor Of Patna Zila Minority High School and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Arvind Kumar Singh

Komal Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anil Kumar Verma @ Anil Verma Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Prasad @ Amit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar