In an anticipatory bail petition filed under Cr.Misc. No.9915 of 2014, the Patna High Court dismissed the application. The Court rejected the plea, citing the gravity of the allegations, including murder (Section 302 IPC), and reliance on the specific nature of the accusation supported by post-mortem evidence.
The bail petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9915 of 2014 (4) dt.20-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9915 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -336 Year- 2013 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ====================================================== 1. Meghraj Yadav Son Of Late Sukan Yadav Resident Of Village- Simuara, P.S. Tekari, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
4 20-08-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9915 of 2014 (4) dt.20-08-2014
(Vikash Jain, J)
P.K./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under the Indian Penal Code.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Meghraj Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
