An application was withdrawn by the petitioner who had been acquitted. The Patna High Court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the application accordingly.
Permission to withdraw application accorded; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7295 of 2014 (2) dt.13-03-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7295 of 2014 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
1. Bablu Kumar Ram S/O Sri Bhogendra Ram Resident Of Village Kanail, P.S. Rahika, District Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Addl.P.P. ====================================================== |
|
| CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA ORAL ORDER ------------- |
|
| 2 |
13-03-2014 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the |
| petitioner that the petitioner has been acquitted, so he seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. |
|
| This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrtawn. |
|
| Tahir/- | (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J) |
Bablu Kumar Ram
The State Of Bihar
SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
