Allowed

Nirmal Kumar @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Mar 2014CR. MISC./50488/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted provisional bail to the petitioner under matrimonial offences, conditional on filing an affidavit for reconciliation and persuading the complainant to return to the matrimonial home or resolving the dispute.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on provisional bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of reconciliation.

Nirmal Kumar @ Pappu Vs The State Of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.50488 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== Nirmal Kumar @ Pappu Son Of Sri Yogendra Prasad R/O MohallaJhilganj, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 19-03-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶3

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 498A, 323, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He is the husband of the complainant.

¶4

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is ready and willing to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant and for that purpose he shall file an affidavit in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in the court below.

¶5

No sooner the aforesaid affidavit is filed in the court below, petitioner above named be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of 5,000/- ( Five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Kumar Gunjan, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Gaya in connection with

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50488 of 2013 (2) dt.19-03-2014

¶7

¶8

Complaint Case No. 310 of 2013 whereafter complainant should be noticed and once she appears, petitioner in presence of the court should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial home.

¶9

In the event complainant comes back to the matrimonial home or the matrimonial dispute is resolved or the complainant is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail allowed to the petitioner should be confirmed, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parties.

¶10

This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶11

Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner.

¶12

(V.N. Sinha, J.)

¶13

Arjun/-

Nirmal Kumar @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nirmal Kumar @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deodhira Sanskarit Uchcha Vidyalay Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Prabhat Kumar Vs Bihar State Electricity Board Through Sri Prabhat Kumar Roy and Ors.

Satendra Nath @ Chhotu Sonar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Wakil Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Prabhawati Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar