Allowed
Munchun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./26361/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26361 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -280 Year- 2013 Thana -BIHARSHARIF District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Munchun Kumar son of Krishna Prasad Jaiswal village Ghansurpur P.S. Salimpur District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 2 06-08-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner is that he was caught with stolen TVS motor cycle bearing registration no. BR01 BD 8949 along with other co accused with stolen vehicle.
Submission is that the petitioner has been made victim of the circumstances. From earlier he has got no criminal antecedent and after this case he has been remanded in three cases. He is in custody since 27/08/2013. He has been sufficiently punished.
In the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, Munchun Kumar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nalanda in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26361 of 2014 (2) dt.06-08-2014
2
Bihar P.S.Case No. 280/2013,subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)
singh/-
U
Munchun Kumar
The State of Bihar
Jitendra Mohan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court