Petitioner sought to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application after conviction. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Prayer to withdraw the application is allowed; petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2117 of 2014 (2) dt.20-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2117 of 2014 ====================================================== Jhalaso Devi @ Yasoda Devi, W/O Jailal Sah, Resident of VillageKatgenwa, P.S- Adapur, District-East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Subash Chandra Mishra, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA ORAL ORDER 2 20-02-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application as the petitioner has been convicted. Prayer is allowed. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) KKSINHA/-
Jhalaso Devi @ Yasoda Devi
The State of Bihar
Shyam Kishore Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
