Petitioner, having already been granted bail under Section 167(2) CrPC, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition. The High Court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it without substantive ordering on the relief sought in the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18721 of 2014
====================================================== Sanjay Mehta, Son of Late Ram Lakhan Mehta, resident of VillageJalalgarh, P.S. -Jalalgarh, District-Purnea .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar through Vigilance .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
In that view of the matter, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Sanjeet/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for bail requires adjudication after prior grant under Section 167(2) CrPC.
Sanjay Mehta
The State of Bihar through Vigilance
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
