Petitioner sought to quash an order directing him to be narrated as an accused in a complaint case. The High Court found no infirmity and dismissed the application.
Application for quashing the order of 23.09.2011 was disposed off as there was no infirmity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COU Criminal M ===================== |
RT OF JUDICA iscellaneous No.17 ============= |
TUR 92 of 2 ==== |
E AT 014 ===== |
PATNA ====== |
== |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pankaj Kumar The State Of Bihar ===================== |
Versus ============== |
.... ===== |
.... ... .... O ===== |
. Petitio pposite Pa ======= |
ner. rty. == |
|
| CORAM: HONOURABLE SINGH ORAL ORDER |
MR. JUSTICE DI | NESH | KUM | AR | ||
| 2 16 |
-01-2014Heard learn |
ed counsels |
for |
the |
petiti |
oner |
and the State. |
||||||
The present |
application |
has |
been |
filed |
for |
|
quashing the order |
dated 23.09. |
2011 |
pass |
ed by |
the |
|
learned J.M. Bagaha |
, (West Cham |
paran |
) in |
Compl |
aint |
|
Case No. 741C of 2 |
000 whereby |
the |
accu |
sation |
was |
|
narrated to the pet |
itioner and |
the |
compl |
ainant |
was |
|
directed to produce |
evidence. |
|||||
ThisCourt |
findsno |
infi |
rmity |
in |
the |
|
impugned order. |
||||||
Accordingly, |
the appli |
catio |
n is |
disp |
osed |
|
off. |
||||||
| U.K./- | (Din | esh Kumar Sing | h, J) |
Pankaj Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
