Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in Thawe P.S. Case No. 107 of 2013 involving IPC Sections 394 and 411. Court denied bail citing nature of accusation, lack of FIR naming, and recovery of stolen motorcycle from petitioner house. Bail petition dismissed.
Anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner is disallowed; bail petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 16244 of 2014
Arising Out of Thawe PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2013 Thana -THAWE District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== 1. Mustaque Alam Son of Abdul Manan Resident of Village-Narayanpur, P.S.-Thawe, District-Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
offences alleged under Sections 394, 411 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 107 of 2013.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16244 of 2014 (3) dt.21-08-2014
2
privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail petition
stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
P.K./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail given that he was not named in the FIR but his name appeared in a co-accused confession and a stolen motorcycle was recovered f
Mustaque Alam
The State Of Bihar
VIKASH JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
