Three petitioners sought anticipatory bail for offences under IPC and the PASCO ACT. The court noted the gravity of offences involving a minor and the informant's complaints of threat. Bail was denied and the petition dismissed.
Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed. Petitioners apprehend arrest for alleged offences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15106 of 2014 (3) dt.07-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15106 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -176 Year- 2013 Thana -MUSAHRI District- MUZAFFARPUR
======================================================
Resident Of Village- Dhobaha, P.S- Mushahari, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 07-08-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15106 of 2014 (3) dt.07-08-2014
informant and her Gotani for pressurising them to accept panchayati.
(Vikash Jain, J)
P.K./-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners charged with offences under IPC and PASCO ACT.
Whether the nature of accusation and gravity of offence justify refusal of bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Hitlal Paswan
Bipat Ram
Nand Kishore Ram
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
