This order considers a petition for anticipatory bail. The court rejected the request, noting the nature of accusations and quantity of recovery, and dismissed the bail application.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed; surrender for regular bail permitted on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11220 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -294 Year- 2013 Thana -BAKHRI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== 1. Surendra Rai @ Surendra Kumar Rai Son Of Bashudeo Rai Resident Of Village - Makkachak, P.S.- Bakhari, District - Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 3 07-08-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11220 of 2014 (3) dt.07-08-2014
2
grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under Sections 290/34 IPC and Section 47(a) of the Excise Act.
Surendra Rai
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
