Single-judge oral order dismissing a petition for anticipatory bail. The Court rejected the petitioner's submission regarding alibi documents without a different view, refusing an extension of the earlier rejected bail order.
Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31107 of 2013 (2) dt.11-09-2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31107 of 2013
====================================================== Santosh Mehta, s/o. Mahabir Mehta, r/o. Vill Rishiup, P.S.Rishiup, Dist. Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kr., Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.K.Singh No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 11-09-2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31107 of 2013 (2) dt.11-09-2013
2
The bail application stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran
(Vikash Jain, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail considering his claim of absence from the crime scene.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Mehta
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
