Hon'ble Chief Justice Vikash Jain orally dismissed an anticipatory bail petition. The Court noted no good reason to reconsider a previous rejection and ordered the petition's rejection.
The anticipatory bail petition is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24962 of 2013
====================================================== Surendra Yadav @ Bhola Yadav, S/o Late Chhabbu Yadav, resident of village- Mansairpur, P.S.- Baliya, District- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2 24-07-2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 363, 366A, 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Mansi Rail P.S. Case No. 17 of 2012, G.R. No. 80 of 2012. 3. An earlier petition for anticipatory bail was rejected by this Court on 11.02.2013 in Cr. Misc. No. 5713 of 2013 and this court finds no good reason to reconsider the matter. 4. The anticipatory bail petition is accordingly rejected.
P.K./-
(Vikash Jain, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner should be reconsidered after a prior rejection.
Surendra Yadav @ Bhola Yadav
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
