The Court restored Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19051 of 2011 against respondent no. 3 and ordered the issuance of notice following belated compliance with service requirements.
Restoration of CWJC No. 19051 of 2011 against respondent no. 3 and order to issue notice on same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.3433 of 2013 (2) dt.17-07-2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3433 of 2013
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19051 of 2011
====================================================== Parwati Devi, wife of Braj Nandan, resident of Village Sri Tola, P.S. Nawada Arrah, District Bhojpur
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
No. 19051 of 2011 stands restored as against respondent no.3,
Patna High Court MJC No.3433 of 2013 (2) dt.17-07-2013
2
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19051 of 2011 should be restored against respondent no. 3 for non-compliance of service order.
Whether notice can be issued to respondent no. 3 after belated filing of requisites.
Parvati Devi
Laldhari Ram
Bimla Kuar
Raj Mati Devi
Shila Devi
Manju Devi
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
