Geeta Rai and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./24530/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court heard an oral order where petitioners apprehending arrest in Section 302/120B IPC cases sought permission to withdraw their application to file separate bail prayers. The matter was discussed during a listing matter without a substantive decision on bail.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24530 of 2013 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| 1. Geeta Rai. 2. Binod Rai. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== |
|
Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Abdul Mannan Khan, Advocate Md. Nagimul Hoda, Advocate ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 16-09-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the |
| State. | |
| The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for offence punishable under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application to file appropriate application for regular bail which may be considered without being prejudiced by the order of this Court in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 09 |
|
| of 2009, pending before the A.C.J.M., Rosera. |
¶2
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)
¶3
Sanjay/-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be considered now given the withdrawal of the specific application to file appropriate prayer for regular bail.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Geeta Rai
- petitioner
Binod Rai
- respondent
The State Of Bihar
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court