The Patna High Court granted permission to the petitioners to withdraw their anticipatory bail application, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn in the connected Mednichouki P.S. Case.
Permission to withdraw anticipatory bail application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12791 of 2013 ====================================================== 1. Golu Mahto. 2. Dukhni Devi. 3. Shobha Devi. 4. Bhabesh Mahto. 5. Dablu Kumar. 6. Bablu Kumar. 7. Ram Bilash Mahto. .... .... Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners. Permission is accorded. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is dismissed as withdrawn in connection with Mednichouki P.S. Case No. 77 of 2012 pending in the court of the learned C.J.M., Lakhisarai. U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Golu Mahto
Dukhni Devi
Shobha Devi
Bhabesh Mahto
Dablu Kumar
Bablu Kumar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
