Allowed

Dhano Rishideo v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Apr 2013CR. MISC./11067/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a murder case instituted under sections 302/34 IPC. The court emphasized the absence of eye-witnesses to the murder and fixed specific conditions for bail, including physical presence at trial dates and restrictions on sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing Rs. 5,000 bond with two sureties subject to conditions of physical presence and affidavit declarations.

Dhano Rishideo Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 11067 of 2013

¶2

=================================================== Dhano Rishideo, Son of Late Chanchal Rishideo. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 22.04.2013 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶3

State.

¶4

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Considering that there is no eye-witness to the actual murder and the Petitioner undertakes to be physically present on each date since trial has started, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge-III, Purnea in connection with S.Tr. No. 1485 of 2012 arising out of Rupauli P.S. Case No. 119 of 1999 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other bailor shall be the maternal uncle of the Petitioner namely Inti Rishideo. The bailor will also

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11067 of 2013 (2) dt.22-04-2013

¶7

¶8

undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be physically present on each date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, his bail shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶9

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶10

Vikash/-

Dhano Rishideo v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhano Rishideo v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Shankar Yadav @ Uma Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Vipul Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar