Allowed

Ramesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Apr 2013CR. MISC./10946/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC. Specific conditions regarding sureties, address updates, and appearance were imposed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties and complying with specific conditions regarding address and court appearances.

Ramesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10946 of 2013 =================================================== Ramesh Yadav S/o Basudeo Yadav Resident of VillageMahesh Dhukwa, P.S- Katoriya, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 22.04.2013 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶2

State.

¶3

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

Considering that the only material against the Petitioner of having been seen last with the deceased, let the Petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 203 of 2012 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other bailor shall be the father of the Petitioner. The bailor will also

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10946 of 2013 (2) dt.22-04-2013

¶6

¶7

undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶8

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶9

Vikash/-

Ramesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uma Shankar Yadav @ Uma Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Vipul Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhano Rishideo Vs The State Of Bihar