Petitioners appealed the decision of the Patna High Court regarding grievances fulfilled. Counsel advised against pressing the application. The Patna High Court dismissed the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 6714 of 2006
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr Sachchidanand Chaudhary 2 For the Respondent/s : Mr GP 12
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH
ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.6714 of 2006 (3) dt.26-07-2012
2 / 2
the grievances of the petitioners has been fulfilled, as such, he has instructions not to press this application.
This application is, accordingly, dismissed as
infructuous.
M.E.H. /-
(Navaniti Prasad Singh)
Harihar Nath Jha
Ram Dev Rai
The State Of Bihar
The Secretary, Road Construction Department, National Highway, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Commissioner, Road Construction Department, National Highway, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department, National Highway Pramandal Purnea, Patna
Navaniti Prasad Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
