Dismissed
Dina Nath Gupta and Ors. v. Smt.Saroj Sinha and Anr.
Patna HCCWJC/3966/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CWJC No.3966 of 2012 (3) dt.06-09-2012 IN…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3966 of 2012 (3) dt.06-09-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3966 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus 1. Smt. Saroj Sinha W/O Late Ram Chandra Prasad Sinha R/O MohallaWeaker Section 1/7, Kankarbagh Housing Colony, P.S.- Kankarbagh, Town And District-Patna :-- Plaintiff/Respondent. 2. Dr. Sarangdhar Prasad S/O Late Krishna Prasad R/O A/110, Kankarbagh, P.S.-Kankarbagh, At Present Residing At Pines 15, Westbourne Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, m 15 STR, United Kingdom Through His Authorized Attorney Sri Agnidhar Prasad, R/O 4H/74, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Buthnath Road, P.S.- Agam Kuan, Town And District- Patna
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Deepak Kumar Pathak, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER
3 06-09-2012 Mr. Deepak Kumar Pathak on instruction from the
counsel for the petitioner Sri Pankaj Maijorwar states that the relief prayed for in the writ petition has become infructuous, which is, accordingly, disposed of.
(V.N. Sinha, J)
P.K.P.
Dina Nath Gupta
Umesh Prasad
Mahesh Prasad
Ramesh Prasad
Yogesh Prasad
Smt. Saroj Sinha
V.N. Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court