Allowed

Naresh Kushwaha @ Naresh Prasad Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Oct 2012CR. MISC./35015/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted bail to the petitioner, who was in jail custody for cases under Sections 489-B, 489-C, and 120-B IPC. The court noted the petitioner was not caught at the spot and names against him appeared in a co-accused's statement. Bail was granted on furnishing sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount to the CJM, Bettiah, subject to appearing in court.

Naresh Kushwaha @ Naresh Prasad Kushwaha Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2012)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35015 of 2012 (2) dt.04-10-2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35015 of 2012

¶4

====================================================== 1. Naresh Kushwaha @ Naresh Prasad Kushwaha S/O Badri Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 04-10-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 19.07.2012 in a case registered under Sections 489 B, 489 C, 120 B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Admittedly, neither petitioner was caught at the spot nor anything was recovered from his conscious possession and the name of this petitioner came in confessional statement of coaccused and except the aforesaid material, there appears to be nothing against the petitioner.

¶6

The impugned order reveals that petitioner carries chequered criminal history but learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already been either acquitted or granted privilege of bail in the above stated cases.

¶7

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35015 of 2012 (2) dt.04-10-2012

¶9

well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 81 of 2012 subject to condition that petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of nine months or till conclusion of his trial whichever is earlier and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates without any genuine cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶10

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶11

SHAHZAD/-

Naresh Kushwaha @ Naresh Prasad Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kushwaha @ Naresh Prasad Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Rajiv Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bahadur Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Bharosa Das Vs the State of Bihar

Chano Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Sujit Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar