The High Court of Patna rejected the petitioner's bail application in the Taryani P.S. Case. The court held that despite the petitioner not being named in the FIR, his identification at the test identification parade warranted rejection of bail.
Prayer for bail in connection with Taryani P.S. Case no. 118/2011 is hereby.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21172 of 2012 (5) dt.05-10-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21172 of 2012
====================================================== Ajijur Rahman .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05/ 05.10.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Although petitioner is named in the first information report but in course of investigation the petitioner was arrested. He was put on test identification parade and in test identification parade, the petitioner was identified by the witnesses. Therefore, I do not feel it proper to release the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Taryani P.S. Case no. 118/2011 pending in the court of Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar is, hereby, rejected. shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail pending trial in Taryani P.S. Case no. 118/2011.
Ajijur Rahman
The State Of Bihar
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
