Disposed

Beby Kumari v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Jan 2010CWJC/16772/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitioner challenged her non-selection for Anganwari Sevika. High Court directed her to exhaust alternative remedy before the District Programme Officer within 30 days, imposing a timeline for disposal. Writ application disposed.

What did the court decide?

Preliminary objection accepted; petitioner directed to file application before District Programme Officer within 30 days; writ disposed.

Beby Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CWJC No.16772 of 2009

¶3

BEBY KUMARI W/O SHEEL MANI, D/O INDRADEO RAY R/O VILLRAGHUNATHPUR PURAB, WARD NO.7, WITHIN RAMPUR BISHUN GRAM PANCHAYAT BLOCK, P.S- WARISNAGAR, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR

¶4

Versus

¶5

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR

¶6

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SAMASTIPUR

¶7

COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, NEW SECRETARIAT, GOVT.OF BIHAR, PATNA

¶8

DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE, I.C.D.S. DIRECTORATE, NEW SECRETARIAT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA

¶9

BAL VIKAS PADADHIKARI, BAL VIKAS PRIYOJNA WARISNAGAR BLOCK, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR

¶10

MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJYA, RAMPUR BISHUN WITIN WARISNAGAR BLOCK, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR

¶11

PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJYA, RAMPUR BISHUN, P.S- WARISNAGAR, BLOCK-WARISNAGAR, DISTTSAMASTIPUR

¶12

KAMANI DEVI W/O LATE GAURI SHANKAR RAY R/O VILLDUBARBANNA, WARD NO.9, P.S- WARISNAGAR, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR

¶13

¶14

22.1.2010

¶15

A preliminary objection is raised on behalf of the

¶16

State that the petitioner has alternative adequate remedy before the District Programme Officer under the notification dated 25.7.2008, aggrieved by the selection of respondent no.

¶17

8 in preference to her for appointment on the post of Anganwari Sevika.

¶18

If the petitioner files such application before the authority within 30 days from today, let the same be considered and disposed after hearing all concerned, including respondent no. 8, by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶19

If the petitioner files any application for interim

¶20

¶21

relief to keep the lis alive before the District Programme Officer, he is obliged to dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of receipt/presentation of the same along with a copy of this order.

¶22

The writ application stands disposed.

¶23

P. Kumar

¶24

(Navin Sinha, J.)

Beby Kumari v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Beby Kumari v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramayan Ram Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Binda Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Asha Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Amrendra Kumar Akela Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Kiran Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sumitra Devi @ Sumitra Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.