Disposed

Most.Sushma Kunwar and Anr. v. the State of Bihar Ors.

Patna HC23 Aug 2010CWJC/10861/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted leave to withdraw several child custody petitions under combined civil revision jurisdiction. The order directed disposal of representation claims without adjudicating merits or verifying if petitioners were covered by prior court orders.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw applications; disposal of representation sought within two months by order if applicant covered by prior orders.

Most.Sushma Kunwar and Anr. Vs the State of… — Child Custody and Guardianship | Patna HC (2010)

¶1

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

 CWJC No.10861 of 2010

¶3

1. MOST. SUSHMA KUNWAR, W/O LATE JAIRANJAN SINGH, R/O VILLAGE
DIGHIKALA EAST , WARD NO. 3, P.S. HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTRICT-
VAISHALI.

¶4

2. SUNDARI DEVI, W/O DHARMNATH DAS, R/O VILLAGE DIGHIKALA EAST ,
WARD NO. 3, P.S. HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI.

¶5

 Versus

¶6

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.

¶7

2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,VAISHALI.

¶8

3. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT,BIHAR,PATNA.

¶9

4. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER,VAISHALI.

¶10

5. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, HAJIPUR RURAL.

¶11

 with

¶12

 CWJC No.10896 of 2010

¶13

1. SRIMATI DEVI, W/O DINESH PRASAD RAI, R/O VILLAGE DIGI KALA
EAST,P.O. DIGHI KALA EAST , P.S. HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTRICT-
VAISHALI.

¶14

 Versus

¶15

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.

¶16

2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,VAISHALI.

¶17

3. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT,BIHAR,PATNA.

¶18

4. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER,VAISHALI.

¶19

5. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, HAJIPUR RURAL.

¶20

 with
 CWJC No.10923 of 2010

¶21

1. SANGEETA KUMARI, W/O RAJEEV KUMAR, R/O VILLAGE DIGI KALA EAST, WARD NO. 3, P.S. HAJIPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI.

¶22

2. NEELAM KUMARI, W/O ARBIND PASWAN, R/O VILLAGE DIGI KALA EAST, WARD NO. 3, P.S. HAJIPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI.

¶23

 Versus

¶24

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR.

¶25

2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,VAISHALI.

¶26

3. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT,BIHAR,PATNA.

¶27

4. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER,VAISHALI.

¶28

5. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, HAJIPUR RURAL.

¶29

 with

¶30

 CWJC No.11173 of 2010

¶31

1. KUMARI ARCHANA W/O PAPPU KUMAR R/O VILL.- DIGI KALA EAST, P.O. DIGHI KALA EAST, P.S. HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTT.- VAISHALI

¶32

 Versus

¶33

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR

¶34

2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI

¶35

3. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA

¶36

4. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, VAISHALI

¶37

5. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, HAJIPUR RURAL

¶38

 with

¶39

 CWJC No.11260 of 2010

¶40

1. SUNITA KUMARI W/O KUNDAN BHAGAT R/O VILL.- DIGI KALA EAST, P.S.- HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTT.- VAISHALI

¶41

¶42

2. BIBHA DEVI W/O NAGENDRA BHAGAT R/O VILL.- DIGI KALA EAST, P.S.- HAJIPUR SADAR, DISTT.- VAISHALI

¶43

 Versus

¶44

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR

¶45

2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI

¶46

3. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR, PATNA

¶47

4. DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, VAISHALI

¶48

5. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, HAJIPUR RURAL

¶49

 -----------

¶50

2/ 23/08/2010 Leave is sought to withdraw the applications to pursue the representation already filed claiming that the petitioner is covered by certain orders of this Court and is entitled to similar treatment.

¶51

Learned counsel for the State submits that it remains a matter for verification if the petitioner was similarly situated on facts and law only whereafter he

¶52

may be entitled to similar treatment.

¶53

It is made clear that this Court has not gone

¶54

into the merits of the matter at all and all issues remain open for consideration by the respondents to decide if the petitioner was covered by any orders of this Court or not.

¶55

Let the representation stated to have been filed

¶56

by the petitioner be disposed of by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/presentation of a copy of this order.

¶57

The applications stand disposed.

¶58

¶59

( Navin Sinha, J.)

Most.Sushma Kunwar and Anr. v. the State of Bihar Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Most.Sushma Kunwar and Anr. v. the State of Bihar Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jharkhand Abhiyojan Sewa Sangh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Afsana Khatoon Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Tiwari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Srimati Devi Vs the State of Bihar Ors.

Sangeeta Kumari and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar Ors.

Renu Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.