Transfer petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner's counsel was absent on two consecutive listing dates. Prior interim order was vacated.
Transfer petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order of 10.04.2018 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
TRP(C) No.94 of 2018
Pritismita Sahoo
Petitioner
None
-versus-
Debasish Mahapatra
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
12.12.2024
Order No. 05.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on call.
3. Earlier also when the matter was listed on 04.12.2024, learned Counsel for the Petitioner was found absent.
4. Accordingly, the Transfer Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
5. Interim order dated 10.04.2018, passed in Misc. Case No.104 of 2018, stands vacated.
6. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this order to the Court below.
(S. K. MISHRA)
JUDGE
Banita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER Reason: AUTHENTICATION Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 13-Dec-2024 18:06:00
Pritismita Sahoo
Debasish Mahapatra
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Banita Priyadarshini Palei
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
