Petitioner filed a memo stating she did not want to proceed and wished to withdraw the transfer petition; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
TRP(C) No.210 of 2017
Ritanjali Parida @ Pradhan …. Petitioner
Mr. M. Mallick, Advocate
-versus-
Chhabindra Parida
Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
11.12.2024
Order No. 03.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner files a memo indicating therein that the Petitioner does not want to proceed in this case and wants to withdraw the writ petition. The memo be kept on record.
3. Accordingly, the transfer petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(S.K. MISHRA)
Banita
JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BANITA PRIYADARSHINI PALEI Designation: SR. STENOGRAPHER Reason: AUTHENTICATION Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 12-Dec-2024 19:18:41
Ritanjali Parida @ Pradhan
Chhabindra Parida
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
