A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner counsel's continued absence from court hearings despite prior listings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8865 of 2019
M/s. Mahavir Industries
Petitioner
None
-versus-
Employees’ State Insurance …. Opposite Parties Corporation and others
Order No.
Mr. A.P. Ray, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA ORDER 18.12.2023
12.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on call.
3. Mr. A.P. Ray, learned Counsel for the Opposite Parties/Corporation is present and files a Memo enclosing thereto, the original postal receipt dated 06.12.2023 along with the tracking report, which indicates that the copy of the Additional Affidavit filed by the Opposite Parties/Corporation, sent to the Petitioner by Registered Post, was delivered on 09.12.2023. The said Memo be kept on record.
4. Earlier also when the matter got listed on 13.11.2023 & 01.12.2023, learned Counsel for the Petitioner was found absent.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
6. Interim order dated 22.05.2019 passed in I.A. No.7351 of 2019 stands vacated.
(S. K. Mishra)
Judge
Prasant
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR PRADHAN Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 19-Dec-2023 18:31:56
Page 2 of 2
M/s. Mahavir Industries
Employees' State Insurance Corporation and others
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
