Counsel, drawing attention of this Court to the operative portion of the Judgment submits, the Court below has enhanced the compensation amount by process of guestimate, which is not permissible in the present facts and circumstances of the case, though the apex Court has held that for limited purpose, the guestimate process may be adopted. Mr. Bhokta, drawing attention of this Court to Ext.1 & 2 further submits, Ext.1 is the certified copy of Registered Sale Deed wherefrom, it is revealed that an area of Ac.0.04 decimals of Sarada Dofasli-I kisam of land was sold at a consideration amount of Rs.60,000/- and Ext.2, which is the certified copy of the Registered Sale Deed, demonstrates that an area of Ac.0.06 decimals of Sarada Dofasli-I kisam land was sold at consideration amount of Rs.72,000/-, which were executed on 11.02.2000 & 28.01.2000 respectively. The area of the acquired lands being small patches, the Court below erred in law to enhance the compensation amount to Rs.8,500/- per decimal from Rs.1486/- per decimal. Hence, the impugned Judgment dated 30.01.2018 passed in L.A. Misc. Case No.77 of 2006 deserves interference.
