Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Manas Ranjan Samantray Vs Idco,Bbsr — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2023)

Home
Orissa HC
2023
Manas Ranjan Samantray Vs Idco,BbsrManas Ranjan Samantray v. Idco,Bbsr

Dismissed

Manas Ranjan Samantray v. Idco,Bbsr

Orissa HC11 Dec 2023WP(C)/4807/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner's writ petition found infructuous after filing an appeal related to the matter before opposite party No. 1. Writ petition dismissed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cite this judgement

Manas Ranjan Samantray v. Idco,Bbsr, WP(C)/4807/2018 (OD), decided on 11 December 2023.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.K. Pattanaik and Kabitarani Majhi

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous on the submission that the petitioner has filed an appeal pursuant to a previous court order regarding the same matter pending before the opposite party.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 4807 of 2018

Manas Ranjan Samantray

…. Petitioner

Mr. U.R. Bastia, Advocate

-Versus-

IDCO, Bhubaneswar & another

…. Opposite Parties Mr. D.K.Behera, ASC

CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 11.12.2023

Order No.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous since the petitioner has filed an appeal pursuant to the Court’s order in W.P. (C) No.16153 of 2018 disposed of on 26^th November, 2018 pending before opposite party No. 1.

In view of above submission, the writ petition stands disposed as being infructuous.

(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge

Kabita

Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed Signed by: KABITARANI MAJHI Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 12-Dec-2023 12:40:17

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Manas Ranjan Samantray
respondent
IDCO, Bhubaneswar

Coram

AI extract

R.K. Pattanaik
Kabitarani Majhi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 11 Dec 2023 · December
Registered: 23 Mar 2018
Case no.: WP(C)/4807/2018
CNR: ODHC010180712018
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: R.k.pattanaik
Disposal: Infructuous

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R.k.pattanaik

Surendranath Mohanty Vs Spl.Planing Auth.
8 Dec 2023
Shubhendu Sahu Vs Spl.Planing Auth.
8 Dec 2023
Purnima Rani Khatua Vs Sub-Collector,Balas
8 Dec 2023
Sanjukta Dash Vs State of Odisha
11 Dec 2023
Deheripali Daily Market Hawkers Union Vs Sambalpur Municipal Corporation
11 Dec 2023
Sukadev Sayan Vs Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
11 Dec 2023