This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous based on the submission that the matter no longer subsists. No legal principles were discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 147 of 2017
Sukadev Sayan …. Petitioner Mr. A.Kanungo, Advocate
-Versus-
Orissa Industrial Infrastructure, …. Opposite Party
Development Corporation & others
Mr. D.K.Behera, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
11.12.2023
Order No.
03. 1. Learned counsel for IDCO is present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter
has already become infructuous.
3. In view of above submission, the writ petition stands
dismissed as being infructuous.
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
Kabita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: KABITARANI MAJHI Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 12-Dec-2023 12:40:17
Sukadev Sayan
Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
