The High Court of Orissa refused an adjournment in a year-old writ petition. The court disposed of the petition with liberty to revive if a cause of action survives and vacated an earlier interim order.
Writ petition disposed with liberty to revive if cause of action survives; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8102 of 2011
Surendranath Mohanty …. Petitioner
Mr. P. K. Nayak, Advocate
-Versus-
Special Planning Authority, Town …. Opposite Parties Planning Unit, Keonjhar, Orissa & another
Mr. P.K. Rout, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No.
08.12.2023
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Balaram Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BALARAM BEHERA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 11-Dec-2023 19:39:13
Surendranath Mohanty
Special Planning Authority, Town Planning Unit, Keonjhar, Orissa
another
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
