The Court declined the petitioner's request for adjournment in a one-year-old writ petition and disposed of it with liberty to revive if the cause of action survives.
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to revive if cause of action survives; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8104 of 2011
Shubhendu Sahu@Suvendu Kumar Sahu …. Petitioner
Mr. P. K. Nayak, Advocate
-Versus-
Special Planning Authority, Town …. Opposite Parties Planning Unit, Keonjhar, Orissa & another
Mr. P.K. Rout, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No.
08.12.2023
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Balaram Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BALARAM BEHERA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 11-Dec-2023 19:39:13
Shubhendu Sahu@Suvendu Kumar Sahu
Special Planning Authority, Town Planning Unit, Keonjhar, Orissa & another
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
