Anadi Charan Nath v. Dgm,Sail Town Admi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear at the time of call and the case was old.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.Pl.(C) No.26624 of 2011
Anadi Charan Nath
….. Petitioner
None
Vs.
The Deputy General Manager, ….. Opposite parties Town Administration, SAIL, RSP, Rourkela & Others
Mr. Goutam Mishra, Sr. Advocate
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR.JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
13.04.2023
Aks
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Anadi Charan Nath
The Deputy General Manager, Opposite parties Town Administration, SAIL, RSP, Rourkela & Others
B.R. SARANGI
M.S. RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court