In a 2010 contempt proceeding, the petitioner failed to appear. Due to lack of prosecution of this old matter, the High Court dropped the proceeding.
Contempt proceeding dropped for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No. 2474 of 2010
Harihar Mohanty
Petitioner None
Vs.
….. Chinmaya Kumar Acharya, Tahasildar, Ganjam
Opposite Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
12.04.2023
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
JUDGE
Ashok
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding should be dropped for want of prosecution.
Harihar Mohanty
Chinmaya Kumar Acharya
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
