In contempt proceedings, the respondent's counsel stated that the previous order of the Court has been complied with. The Court dropped the contempt proceedings noting compliance.
Contempt proceedings dropped due to compliance with the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.116 of 2019
Labanyabala Padhi
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Samantray, Advocate
Vs.
Amulya Kumar Jena (O.R.S), ….. Opposite Parties Asst. Settlement Officer, Cuttack & Another
Mr. L. Samantaray, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
12.04.2023
03.
2. Mr. L. Samantaray, learned Additional Government Advocate
states that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.
3. In view of the above, the contempt proceeding is hereby
dropped.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
Laxmikant JUDGE
Labanyabala Padhi
Amulya Kumar Jena
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
