Disposed

Kalpita Dash v. the Bm, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Bbsr

Orissa HC23 Dec 2022WP(C)/31990/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed writ petition seeking quashing of demand and possession notices and direction to settle loan account. Court disposed matter without expressing opinion on merits, directing respondent to consider representation within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate order within four weeks.

Kalpita Dash Vs the Bm, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Bbsr — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P (C) No.31990 of 2022

¶3

Kalpita Dash ….. Petitioner Mr. G.K. Acharya, Advocate Vs. ….. The Branch Manager, CAN Opposite Parties Fin Homes Ltd., BBSR & Another

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

¶6

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

¶7

ORDER

¶8

23.12.2022

¶9

Order This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. No. 1. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶10

“ In view of the facts and circumstances stated above, it is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to (i) To issue a writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ/writs by quashing the demand notice dated 01.09.2022 under Annexure-2 and possession notice dated 10.11.2022 under Annexure-6 issued by the opp. parties. (ii) Further direct the opp. parties to ettle the loan account of the petitioner through OTS as per the RBI guidelines within a stipulated period. (iii) Pass any other order or further orders as deemed just and proper. (iv) And for this act of kindness, the petitoner

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

shall, as in duty bound, ever pray.

¶13

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting her grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

¶14

5 . As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-5 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶15

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

¶16

(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE

¶17

Ashok/Sangita

¶18

Page 2 of 2

Kalpita Dash v. the Bm, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Bbsr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalpita Dash v. the Bm, Can Fin Homes Ltd., Bbsr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nhai, Sundergarh Vs Tata Sponge Iron Pvt. Ltd., Keonjhar

R.J.Bharat Kumar Vs State of Odisha

Krushna Chandra Sahoo Vs Ao, Canara Bank, Bbsr

Basanti Naik Vs State of Odisha

Babuli Jhankar Vs State of Odisha

Gajendra Prasad Panda Vs State of Odisha