A written appeal arising from an impugned order of the learned Single Judge was disposed of as infructuous due to the passage of time, leaving legal questions open.
The writ appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.A. No. 91 of 2019
…. Byomakesh Panda and Others Appellants
Mr. Dillip Ray, Advocate
-versus…. State of Odisha and Others Respondents None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER Order No. 28.03.2023 03. 1. Due to passage of time, the issues raised in the present petition, arising from the impugned order of the learned Single Judge, have been rendered infructuous. 2. Leaving the questions of law raised in this appeal open for consideration in some other appropriate case, the writ appeal is disposed of as infructuous. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (G. Satapathy) Judge
Order No.
Subhasmita
Byomakesh Panda and Others
State of Odisha and Others
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
