This court set aside an order for violation of natural justice due to lack of opportunity to file a reply and remitted the writ petition to the Single Judge for proceedings on merits.
Impugned order dated 13 August 2021 set aside; writ petition remitted to Roster Bench of Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 33 of 2022
…. State of Odisha and Another Appellants
Mr. Manoj Kumar Khuntia, Additional Government Advocate
-versus-
…. Bichitrananda Nayak and Another Respondents Mr. Budhadev Routray, Advocate
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
27.03.2023
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(G. Satapathy) Judge
Subhasmita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order passed without affording an opportunity to the State to file a para-wise reply should be set aside.
State of Odisha
G. Satapathy
S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
