Appeal against single judge order dismissing W.P.22360 of 2021, which was decided on same bench earlier W.P. on different post regularization. HC set aside appeal and restored W.P. for substantive hearing after distinguishing facts.
Impugned order set aside; Writ Petition 22360 of 2021 restored for hearing with proper reply filed by State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No.207 of 2022
State of Odisha and Others
…. Appellants Mr. M. K. Khuntia, AGA
-versus-
Pramod Kumar Das
…. Respondent
M/s. B. S. Tripathy-1 and Associates, Advocates
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER 28.03.2023
Order No.
Page 1 of 1
then proceed in accordance with law and endeavour to dispose of the writ petition as expeditiously as possible.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
M. Panda
(G. Satapathy)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned judgment disposing the writ petition without opportunity to the State to distinguish it from a precedent on Data Entry Operators should be set aside.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Patitapaban Dutta Dash v. State of OdishaReferred¶1
Patitapaban Dutta Dash v. State of Odisha
State of Odisha and Others
Pramod Kumar Das
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
