The High Court of Odisha set aside an order dated 13th August 2021 passed without giving the State an opportunity to file a reply. The writ petition was remitted to the Single Judge for directions despite a clerical date appearing in the order.
Impugned order dated 13.08.2021 set aside; writ petition remitted to Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 32 of 2022
State of Odisha and Another
…. Appellants
Mr. Manoj Kumar Khuntia, Additional Government Advocate -versus-
Aneeta Panda
…. Respondent Mr. Ramdas Achary, Advocate
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
27.03.2023
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(G. Satapathy) Judge
Subhasmita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order passed without affording the appellant an opportunity to file a para-wise reply can be set aside.
State of Odisha and Another
Aneeta Panda
G. Satapathy
S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
