The writ petition was dismissed for lack of instructions from the petitioner. Liberty was granted to approach the court again if the cause of action arises in the future.
Petition dismissed for no instruction; liberty granted to approach court again.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC(OAC) No.2833 of 2012
Dileswar Singh
Petitioner(s)
Mr. S.K. Ojha, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party(s)
Mr. U.K. Sahoo, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
Order No.
03.03.2022
1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for Petitioner that he has no instruction in the matter.
2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed for no instruction. Liberty is, however, granted to the Petitioner to approach this Court again in the event any cause of action involving this issue arises in future.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
A.K. Jena
Page 1 of 1
Dileswar Singh
State of Orissa
Biswanath Rath
A.K. Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
