This court disposed of a civil miscellaneous petition challenging an order allowing documents as exhibits, finding no infirmity as pleadings contained no such documents.
Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
C.M.P. No.1430 of 2019
Narendra Kumar Panda
…. Petitioner(s) Mr. A.K. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
Basanta Kar & Ors.
…. Opposite Party(s) Mr. B. Mohanty, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
03.03.2022
Order No.
2. Considering the submissions made by the parties, this Court nowhere finds any pleadings involving such documents even in the plaint.
In the circumstances, this Court finds, there is no infirmity in the impugned order. However since the suit is still pending, if the Petitioner is so advised, may undertake appropriate exercise to overcome such difficulties.
3. With the aforesaid observation the Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands disposed of.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
Ayaskanta Jena
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of the trial court allowing marking of documents was infirm?
Whether appropriate exercises should be undertaken by the petitioner for pending suit?
Narendra Kumar Panda
Basanta Kar
Biswanath Rath
Ayaskanta Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
