The Court disposed of a writ petition filed in 2005. Finding that the cause of action had suffered due to the efflux of time as the judgment year was 2022, the Court advised the petitioner to seek an appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OA) NO.213 OF 2005
Kokila Patika
Petitioner
Mr.A.Rath, Adv.
-versus-
The R.D.C., Berhampur & ors.
…. Opposite Parties Mr.S.Ghose, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
Order No.
3.3.2022
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
M.K.Rout
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding disciplinary proceedings, filed in 2005, can be entertained given the cause of action suffers from efflux of time by 2022.
Kokila Patika
The R.D.C., Berhampur
Biswanath Rath
M.K. Rout
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
