The High Court of Orissa dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking interference with an unchallenged impugned order that had already awarded costs for a technical interim application, noting no reason to disturb it as adjudication could occur on contest.
Petitioner's prayer for interference was denied; Civil Miscellaneous Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
C.M.P.No.811 of 2021
Rukmani Devi Agarwal
Petitioner(s) Mr.B.Sahoo. Advocate
-versus-
Ajay Kumar Agarwal
Opposite Party(s)
Mr.S.Udgata, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
03.03.2022
Order No.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Rukmani Devi Agarwal
Ajay Kumar Agarwal
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
