Petitioner permitted to make fresh representation before Opposite party No.2; matter adjourned for consideration of grievances without final disposal or operative relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OA) No.2299 of 2016
Premananda Luha …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No 10.08.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the
following prayer:
“to quash the order under Annexure-1 passed
by the Respondent No.1 by declaring it as illegal
and erroneous.
Hon’ble Tribunal kindly grant any other reliefs
in favour of the applicant for ends of justice.”
4. Taking into account the submissions made, the
Petitioner is permitted to make fresh representation
before Opp. party No.2 in that regard within a period
of two weeks from today.
5. It is observed that if any such representation is filed by the Petitioner ventilating his grievances, the same shall be considered by Opp. party No.2 in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation.
// 2 //
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
sangita
Page 2 of 2
Premananda Luha
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
