The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition (WPC(OA) No.1462 of 2016) as unfunded due to the petitioner's counsel having received no instruction from the client, while granting liberty to file a fresh petition if the cause of action subsists.
Petition dismissed; liberty granted to file a fresh petition if cause of action subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OA) No.1462 of 2016
Saroj Kumar Nayak
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
08.08.2022
Order No
2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has
received no instruction from his client.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Saroj Kumar Nayak
State of Odisha
Biraj Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
