Antaryami Sahoo v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed Rule 1866 of 2016 for non-prosecution as the petitioner appeared in court without legal representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No.1866 of 2016
Antaryami Sahoo
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
08.08.2022
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . None appears for the Petitioner, when the matter is
called out.
3. Accordingly, the WPC(OAC) is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Antaryami Sahoo
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court