The High Court of Orissa, noting that the petitioner was superannuated before filing the petition, held the prayer unacceptable under these circumstances. The writ petition was dismissed.
The writ petition was dismissed as unentertainable post-superannuation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OA) NO.187 OF 2013
Subas Chandra Dash
…. Petitioner
Mr.S.N.Patnaik, Adv.
-versus-
State Government of Odisha & ors.
…. Opposite Party(s) Mr.S.P.Panda, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER 4.3.2022
Order No.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
M.K.Rout
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should entertain a petition for pension/post-retirement benefits filed after the petitioner's superannuation.
Subas Chandra Dash
State Government of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
M.K. Rout
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
