Dismissed
Dhaneswar v. Upendranath
Orissa HCOJC/6411/1999
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition stands dismissed for no instruction due to the petitioner's counsel being unable to proceed despite registered office letters, noting discrepancies in the 1999-pending writ petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
O.J.C. No.6411of 1999
¶3
Dhaneswar Jena & Ors.
¶4
Petitioner(s) Mr.R.K.Prusty, Advocate
¶5
-versus-
¶6
Upendranath Jena & Ors.
¶7
Opposite Party(s) Mr.N.C.Pati, Advocate
¶8
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
¶9
ORDER
¶10
04.03.2022
¶11
Order No.
¶13
- Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Dhaneswar Jena & Ors.
- respondent
Upendranath Jena & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
BISWANATH RATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court