Dismissed
Janhabi v. Commnr.
Orissa HCOJC/9527/1992
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A writ petition seeking relief against an impugned order was disposed of without interference. The Court noted a remand proceeding in a batch of similar cases and directed termination if not already done.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stands disposed of without interfering in the impugned order.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
O.J.C. No.9527 of 1992
¶3
Smt. Janhabi Samal
¶4
…. Petitioner(s) Mr.S.Mishra, Advocate
¶5
-versus-
¶6
The Commissioner, Consolidation, …. Opposite Party(s) Orissa & Ors. Mr.R.P.Mohapatra, AGA
¶7
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
¶8
ORDER 04.03.2022
¶9
Order No.
¶11
- Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
¶12
- A batch of cases involving same issue have come to be disposed of in disposal of O.J.C.No.9026 of 1992 by order of Division Bench dated 23.04.1998. Considering the submission involved and the order therein passed in similar cases, this Court finds there is no possibility of giving a different view here. There is no scope for interfering in the impugned order keeping in mind that there has been a remand proceeding. In the circumstance, this writ petition stands disposed of without interfering in the impugned order. However, in the event the remand proceeding is not terminated as of now, same shall be terminated within a period of six months from the date of communication of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Smt. Janjabi Samal
- respondent
The Commissioner, Consolidation, Orissa & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
Biswanath Rath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court